posted in 
Actually, there’s nothing wrong with it. It’s just that this Domino magazine (September 2008 ish) has no girl on the cover.
Domino always placed girls on their covers (see above). I liked the fact that a lot of them were not celebs (they were interior designers, attractive homeowners, or not-too-sikat models); but they recently put a lot of A-list celebrities lately, which I didn’t like.
So what do you like? Girl or no girl on the cover? 
By the way thank you, Becky dear, for pointing this out.
articles RSS
August 21st, 2008 at 1:49 am
That was the exact thing I first noticed too!
August 23rd, 2008 at 12:13 am
The cover is designer Matthew Williamson’s house, I guess they couldnt put him on the cover (he is not that cute).
August 23rd, 2008 at 10:39 pm
muther, i’m reading my copy now and it’s a terrific issue. but i gotta say i prefer the real-girl-on-the-cover covers. (emphasis on real girl; i hated the drew b. cover!) i think it’s part of the whole domino formula—casual, accessible, kaya mong gawin like this cute girl on the cover. without the girl, it feels like it could be the cover of just another shelter mag.
August 24th, 2008 at 11:02 pm
yup, yup i totally agree with ms. kho.