A license, that is. Who would have known that a simple 2″ x 3″ plastic card with a fuzzy mugshot that embarrassingly divulges your birthdate yet establishes that you are an architect or interior designer would cause so much furor over the past few years?
This culminated quite recently in the legal battles and the ruffling of some feathers amongst the designer set. Writer Alex Vergara related it recently in an Inquirer article, reporting firsthand accounts of homeowners being duped by shysters masquerading as professional designers, and explaining PIID’s current handling of this issue, and how they are dealing with the remaining long-time practicing unlicensed designers who have yet to avail of RA 8534’s grandfather’s clause.
If the law gets strictly implemented, many homeowners and other clients will be spared the pain of having to deal with unschooled practitioners who are out to make a killing from markups and commissions. Admittedly, there are quite a few of them out there—and a lot of them aren’t even formally trained as designers, nor have even taken a diploma course!
But what about those unlicensed designers whose portfolios not only show professionally and correctly executed design works, but exemplary (as in, internationally-acclaimed) design as well?
Now that’s something to think about. Take note: a Pritzker Prize-winning architect, Tadao Ando, was self-schooled and trained, and admits to having a past job as a carpenter!
This issue on the interior design side seems to be on the road to being settled, but much has to be said about the architectural license side. It seems to have gotten even more ugly over the past year. To top it all off, our office received two inch-thick document envelopes from the UAP (United Architects of the Philippines) Cebu a few months ago, without them even having the courtesy of calling up this office to explain it. The cover letter accused this magazine of violating RA9266 for “…helping, confederating and conniving (name of designer) in perpetrating and fulfilling his illegitimate desires…†(Click on image to read the rest)
My reaction:
The senders of this letter accused us of having our writer issue a certification stating that we had used the term “architect†loosely in one of articles, in order to protect the said designer. The writer that they stated was not our contributor, and Real Living issued no such certification for that purpose. I was also dismayed to learn afterwards that similar “threat†letters were sent to other home and design publications and the clients of the said designer.
Why can’t the UAP Cebu people who sent this letter settle it in private? Are the clients going to turn against this designer, as most of them have hired him many times in the past to execute their residences? And if you guys win, are his clients going to hire you, letter-senders? Hmm?
What about going after those international design firms who practice in our country, get paid several times more than our own designers and who hire our licensed Filipino designers to become “architects of record?†Why don’t you go after those foreign guys instead? Or instead of wracking up those legal bills, why not allot the money for the education of a deserving design student or a licensed UAP member who wants to have further design studies abroad?
How about settling this decently and focusing on something more important: our young interior designers and architects in their 20s and 30s. They have fresh ideas, tend to not get into the politics of the profession, and just honestly want to produce excellent design. They also do not have a chip on their shoulder or accumulated baggage, and a lot of them are pretty damn good.
Now that’s something to think about. Comments are welcome. 